Laravel: Understanding asset(..) and Storage::url(…) Usage

Dr. Adam Nielsen
2 min readNov 16, 2023

When I first delved into Laravel, a robust PHP framework for web development, I found myself puzzled by the asset(..) helper and Storage facade. Understanding when and why to use these tools is crucial for efficient and scalable application development.

What to Use and When: A Comparative Overview

Laravel provides two primary methods for handling asset URLs:

Storage::url(…) Method: Ideal for dynamic content storage. For instance, when dealing with user-uploaded files, Storage::url($user->avatar) generates a URL based on the current storage disk, which can be local or cloud-based (like Amazon S3). This method offers flexibility, especially when scaling your application or migrating storage solutions.

<img src="{{ Storage::url($user->avatar) }}" />

asset(..) Helper: Designed for linking static assets like compiled JavaScript and CSS files in the public directory, the asset helper is crucial for maintaining correct links. When the ASSET_URL in your environment changes, remember to also move your assets accordingly during deployment. This is particularly important for tools like Vite or Laravel Mix, and for packages with integrated assets like the Voyager Dashboard, ensuring smooth integration and functionality in your Laravel projects.

Usually, if you use Laravel Mix or Vite, you don’t have to use asset helper, as they have their own helper to load css/js, which also takes care of versioning. However, Laravel Mix and Vite do rely on your envirenment setting of ASSET_URL. The asset helper should only be used for static assets files that don’t change.

Why Avoid Hardcoding Storage Links?

Using hardcoded image links like <img src="/storage/{{ $user->avatar }}" /> can lead to issues. This method works only with a local storage driver and a symlink. But what if your application's storage needs grow beyond your server's capacity?

Why Avoid Hardcoding Asset Links?

Using hardcoded asset links like <script src="/timmy.js" /> can lead to an issue if you wish to move your assets to a CDN and change the domain. Using <script src="{{ asset('/timmy.js') }}" /> will take care of it.

The Case for Cloud Storage and CDN

Migrating to a cloud storage solution like Amazon S3, combined with a Content Delivery Network (CDN), can significantly improve your application’s performance and scalability. Cloud storage is not only cost-effective but also reduces the load on your server, especially when it comes to backups and handling large volumes of data. Moreover, a CDN ensures faster loading times for your assets, which enhances user experience.

Summing Up

In summary, use Storage::url(…) for dynamic content that might require scaling or migration to different storage solutions. For static assets like JavaScript and CSS files, the asset(..) helper is your go-to solution. Understanding these tools and their appropriate use cases is key to building efficient, scalable Laravel applications.

Feel free to experiment with both methods in your projects and observe the differences. Happy coding!

--

--

Dr. Adam Nielsen
Dr. Adam Nielsen

Written by Dr. Adam Nielsen

PHD in math. and Laravel / Vue Full-Stack-Developer

No responses yet